This Fire Services Outcomes Framework – Progress Report provides the Country Fire Authority (CFA) and Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) Quarter 4 (Q4) FY 2022-23 fire services performance indicator results, in line with FSIM’s legislative requirements under section 141 of the Fire Rescue Victoria Act 1958 (FRV Act).
This report presents quarterly results provided by CFA and FRV against their respective performance measures and agency commentary on quarterly performance. Where possible, FSIM has included historical data against measures provided by agencies from 1 July 2020 as a reference for the reader, noting that historical data is significantly limited due to changes in agencies’ outcomes frameworks in Q2[1] and other incidents outlined below.
FSIM noted in Quarters 2 and 3 that a lack of data impacted FRV’s ability to report performance results and progress toward outcomes. While FRV continues to experience some issues accessing data following the cyber-attack incident in December 2022, this quarter they have been able to report against 22 (of 26) indicators, a significant improvement from previous quarters in FY2022-23. Additionally, to address some remaining information gaps in Q4, FRV obtained data from Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority (ESTA) and undertook comparative reporting of 5 measures relating to false alarms, structure fires, and response times. FRV report that work continues to restore reporting systems.
Reporting on outcomes
Section 140(1) of the FRV Act requires CFA and FRV to each prepare an outcomes framework that sets out their respective outcomes-based fire service performance measures. In developing and refining their outcomes frameworks, CFA and FRV each determined their strategic organisational priorities and the associated indicators and measures of performance to be included in those frameworks.
Tracking the progress of agencies towards their outcomes is a long-term proposition and trends or patterns may only be observable over an extended period. FSIM continues to update its outcomes reporting approach and may highlight particular indicators in the summary by exception where a result:
- shows a continuing off-track trend over repeated quarters
- demonstrates a notable achievement
- varies more than 5% from the agencies baseline or average over time
- is a significant change from the previous quarter (positive or negative).
FSIM notes that some performance measures are influenced by factors outside the control of CFA or FRV and in some instances, agencies may not be able to provide substantiated reasons, supported by evidence for changes to results.
In future, FSIM will work with agencies to identify outcomes that may benefit from a deeper assessment of progress, taking into account relevant data limitations and outcome framework amendments.
Maturing outcomes frameworks
The CFA and FRV Outcomes Frameworks signal the strategic priorities of each organisation, and each provides a set of indicators and measures to demonstrate progress towards their respective strategic goals. The ongoing review and refinement of both Outcomes Frameworks is important to assist agencies to assess progress towards delivering against their objectives and support informed, evidence-based decision making. Updates to the agencies’ outcome frameworks for Q4 are outlined below.
CFA’s Outcomes Framework 2022-23
CFA has reported on a total of 29 quarterly indicators and 17 annual indicators. Baselines for eight indicators will be introduced in future quarterly outcomes framework reports when historical data becomes available.[2] CFA introduced targets for five indicators to its current Outcomes Framework (2022-23).[3] Baseline data will continue to be provided in CFA outcomes progress reporting where targets are introduced, providing additional context.
FRV’s Outcomes Framework
Ongoing impacts of the December 2022 cyber-attack on FRV’s systems (outlined below) continues to limit FRV’s ability to report retrospectively and continued to impact reporting this quarter. However, in Q4, FRV were able to provide data against 22 of its 26 indicators. This is a significant increase compared to seven indicators FRV reported on in Q3 2022-23. FRV also reported on 36 out of 46 measures. Measures are aimed to inform progress against a given indicator.
During the fourth quarter, FRV introduced a year-on-year (YoY) status where quantitative data is available to highlight positive and negative trends, allowing for a comparison between the annual results of FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23.
FRV report that a YoY status could not be reported for 17 measures out of 36 reported in Q4. This is a result of the cyber-attack on FRV[4] leading to insufficient data to calculate a year-on-year comparison and industrial actions restricting reporting of certain measures[5] from the period of 27 October 2022 to 30 April 2023.
Outcomes framework Q4 results commentary overview
FSIM highlights indicators with a variance of more than 5% from the agencies baseline or average over time and indicators that demonstrated a notable achievement. As reported above, FRV’s data limitations constrain FSIM’s ability to assess FRV quarterly progress on all indicators.
Indicators with a variance of more than 5% from the agencies baseline or average over time
Fire suppression
CFA reported an improvement in indicator 2.2.3 (average time spent to suppress structure fires) from 73 minutes 1 second in Q3 to 65 minutes in Q4. Despite this improvement, CFA did not meet the 58 minutes 4 seconds baseline in Q4. CFA has not identified any specific trends or factors that have driven the 2022-23 Q4 performance for this indicator. CFA recognised that there are a significant range of factors that can influence this outcome including fire progression at time of arrival, building type, timeliness of supporting services (such as gas and power) and the presence of hazardous materials. FSIM understand that many of these factors are unable to be quantified.
FSIM notes the Q4 result in 2022-23 reflects increased time spent suppressing structure fires when compared to Q4 results from FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22.
Response to structure fire
In Q4, due to the cyber-attack, FRV have replaced Australian Incident Reporting System (AIRS) data with Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority (ESTA) data and have reported a decline in quarterly and annual average performance for response to structure fire incidents within 7.7 mins (measure 2.1.3a).[6] FSIM observes that the Q4 result was 6.87% below the comparable quarterly results in Q4 2021-22 and 4.3% below the annual average results recorded for 2021-22. FRV advise that the electronic automated Station Turnout System was compromised during the December 2022 cyber-attack, and the return to manual dispatch processes, such as pagers to dispatch crews, increased the time it took firefighters to turnout from the station. FRV reported that the time taken for firefighters to arrive on scene after leaving the station remains constant. FRV advise that manual processes will continue to be used to dispatch crews until the FRV electronic Station Turnout System is back online.
Firefighter demographics
In Q4, FRV have reported on two annual indicators that demonstrate the age profile of FRV staff (3.2.3a) and the age profile of staff turnover (3.4.2a). Measure 3.2.3a (workforce profile) indicates that 1,242 of 4,809 (25.8%) total operational and non-operational FRV staff are aged above 55 years. In addition, 1,084 of 4,809 (22.5%) are aged between 45-55 years old. FRV have also reported that 116 staff over the age of 55 years have exited FRV in 2022-23 (measure 3.4.2a), which includes 90 operational and 26 non-operational staff. Based on the age profile for 2022-23 (annual results), FSIM recognises that in 10 years-time, FRV will have a significant number of retiring staff.
FRV recognises the age profile of its operational staff and the need to plan and prepare for significant workforce retirements over the next five years. FSIM notes that under the Year Two to Five Fire Services Reform Implementation Plan – action 5.4 is developing a 5-year FRV Strategic Workforce Plan (Operations) for the period 2023-2027 to address its workforce requirements.
Indicators that demonstrated a notable achievement
After Action Reviews
In Q4, CFA recorded a significant increase in results for 4.4.1 (number of After-Action Reviews) compared to Q1, Q2 and Q3.
CFA report that this increase in performance is due to additional CFA facilitator training and major flood events that required the facilitation of After-Action Reviews and the CFA post-seasonal debrief. FSIM notes that an increase in After Action Reviews informs continuous improvement in operational service delivery for the CFA and the wider emergency management sector.
Smoke alarms
In Q4, CFA and FRV have reported on results for smoke alarm campaigns during the 2022-23 FY.
CFA reported a significant improvement in performance for the number of homes with operational smoke alarms (indicator 2.3.6), which includes the installation and maintenance of smoke alarms for vulnerable people who require assistance to maintain or install smoke alarms in their homes. Key contributors to this improvement includes CFA investment in skills and resources available through training provided to CFA members and the use of digital service delivery tools for reporting and smoke alarm installation visits. CFA advises that there are a variety of approaches that regions use to inform this result, for instance South-West Region continued to grow and develop a Residential Advice Visit Service and CFA brigades in South-East Region ran a campaign to identify people at higher risk and ensure they had working smoke alarms.
FRV report on results from an online survey of Victorian homeowners (conducted between 8 and 19 September 2022) to determine the effectiveness of the joint CFA and FRV smoke alarm awareness campaign. FRV report that the campaign received a good response from the community. The survey results informed recommendations on future smoke alarms awareness campaigns considering advertising channels and message refinement.
FSIM supports CFA and FRV collaboration in providing smoke alarm awareness and preparedness initiatives to improve community safety from fire in the home.
Footnotes
[1] 2022-23 Quarter 2 Fire Services Outcomes Framework Progress Report
[2] Baselines will be introduced for the following indicators when historical data becomes available:2.1.3, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 3.2.5, 3.3.3, 4.1.1, 4.4.2.
[3] Targets were reported on the following CFA indicators in Q4: 1.1.1, 2.3.6, 3.4.4, 3.4.5, 4.3.2.
[4] 1.1.2b, 1.1.3b, 1.3.1, 2.3.1, 3.1.1a, 3.1.1b, 3.1.1c, 3.1.1d, 3.2.1a, 3.2.1b, 3.2.1c, 3.2.3a, 3.3.1, 3.4.2a, 3.4.4
[5] 1.2.3. 1.3.3
[6] This measure calculates the number of emergency responses to structure fire callouts that meet a benchmark of 7.7 minutes as a percentage of the total calls for each quarter.
Updated